Skip to main content
editor.ajphr@gmail.com
9409046853
e-ISSN: 2321-3647
American Journal of Pharmacy and Health Research

American Journal of Pharmacy and Health Research

Rajat Garg

Author Profile
MM College of Pharmacy, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala – 133 207, Haryana, India.
1
Publications
1
Years Active
4
Collaborators
49
Citations

Publications by Rajat Garg

1 publication found • Active 2026–2026

2026

1 publication

ASSESSMENT OF INTRAVENOUS HIGH-RISK MEDICATION MANAGEMENT IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

with Hemant Bhardwaj, Anjum Qadir Lone, Dr Tarun Singh, Bimal K Agrawal
11/3/2026
pp. 13-24

Iatrogenic harm induced from medication occur at a rate more than one fourth in general wards and more than three fourth in ICUs, it estimated that during a critical care stay 1.7 medication errors per patient could be potentially life-threatening especially from drug given intravenously. We Aimed to assess the intravenous high-risk medication management in tertiary care hospital, and analyze utilization of IV high-risk medication dilution, diluent and duration. Methods Prospective controlled study involving 250 participants evaluated the utilization patterns of intravenous high-risk medications in equal divided groups, with a focus on dilution practices, diluent selection, and duration of administration in a critical care unit over a period of six months. A researcher observed this study by reviewing all the Patient Infusion Charts, Critical Care Flow Sheet and Syringe pump/infusions. Baseline severity was assessed using APACHE II and qSOFA scores. Categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test. Results A total of 250 participants were enrolled and equally allocated into two groups 125 intervention and 125 Control. Analyzing the baseline clinical severities parameters including APACHE II scores (p = 0.845) and qSofa (p = 0.589) were distinguished between groups. No statistically significant differences were observed in primary clinical outcomes such as mortality (p =0.447) or discharge status (p = 0.609). A researcher independent double-checking before medication administration was documented in 81 (64.8%) intervention patients compared to 79 (63.2%) control patients (p =0.895). Conclusion In conclusion, primary outcomes were statistically distinct between the study groups, pharmacist-led observation and independent double-checking protocols established structured standardization in IV drug dilution, diluent selection, and infusion rate monitoring. Further research using more sensitive methods to assess key variables will provide a clearer and more comprehensive understanding of the true impact of pharmacist-led care on clinical outcomes. Keywords: High-Risk Medications; Intensive Care Units; Infusions; Patient Safety

Author Statistics
Total Publications:1
Years Active:1
First Publication:2026
Latest Publication:2026
Collaborators:4
Citations:49
Whatsapp