editor.ajphr@gmail.com
9409046853
e-ISSN: 2321-3647
logo

American Journal of Pharmacy and Health Research

American Journal of Pharmacy and Health Research

Publish your research paper in a peer reviewed open access pharmacy journal with fast review, low publication fees, and global visibility. Submit now to AJPHR

📢 Latest Update: Call for Papers for a Peer Reviewed Open Access Pharmacy Journal with Fast Publication

📢 Latest Update: Call for Papers for a Peer Reviewed Open Access Pharmacy Journal with Fast Publication

Important Journal Details

Title:
American Journal of Pharmacy and Health Research
Journal Short Name:
AJPHR
e-ISSN (Online):
2321-3647
Year of Establishment:
2013
Frequency of the Publication:
Monthly (1 Issue / month)
Publication Format:
Online
Publication URL:
https://ajphr.com
Related Subject:
Health ResearchPharmacyPharmaceutical ResearchToxicology
Language:
English
Editor-in-Chief:
Dr H J Patel
Editorial Board:
Click Here →

Download Forms & Formats

Download Hub

Journal Features

Rigorous Peer Review

All submissions to our peer reviewed journal in pharmacy and health research undergo expert evaluation to ensure quality and scientific validity.

Global Reach

As an international open access pharmacy journal, AJPHR provides global visibility to researchers, academicians, and industry professionals

Rapid Publication

Our fast publication pharmacy journal ensures timely review and publication without compromising research quality.

Open Access

AJPHR is an open access pharmacy journal for global research visibility, making all published papers freely accessible online.

Publication Process

1

Prepare Manuscript

Format your paper according to our guidelines

View Guidelines
style="fill: var(--journal-600);"
2

Submit Paper

Upload your manuscript through our system

Submit Now
3

Peer Review

Your paper undergoes expert evaluation

Learn More
4

Publication

Accepted papers are published worldwide

View Publications
View All Issues
Cover image for COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF INJECTION PAIN DURING ADMINISTRATION OF LOCAL ANAESTHESIA AFTER TOPICAL ANAESTHETIC GEL VERSUS CRYOTHERAPY APPLICATION: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF INJECTION PAIN DURING ADMINISTRATION OF LOCAL ANAESTHESIA AFTER TOPICAL ANAESTHETIC GEL VERSUS CRYOTHERAPY APPLICATION: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Dr. Sunayana Bidave, Dr. Pratima Shenoi, Dr. Chetana Makade, Dr. Gautam Badole, Dr. Ankita Ramteke

Background: The insertion of local anesthetic solution remains one of the most dreaded events during dental treatment, and discomfort from needle penetration is a recognised source of dental anxiety and treatment avoidance. Topical anesthetic gels and pre-injection cooling (cryotherapy) have both been proposed to reduce this discomfort, yet direct comparisons in adult endodontic patients are limited. Objective: To compare pain perception during administration of local anesthesia following a 2% lignocaine topical gel versus a standardized ice-stick cryotherapy protocol. Materials and Methods: In this two-arm crossover randomized controlled trial, patients aged 18–60 years requiring endodontic treatment in at least two teeth received both protocols at separate sites: 2% lignocaine gel (Group A) for 1 minute and a customized ice stick measuring 5 mm × 10 mm (Group B) for 15 seconds before injection. Injection pain was self-rated on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS), and scores were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test at a 5% level of significance. Results: The mean VAS score was 3.65 ± 1.00 in Group A and 2.53 ± 0.94 in Group B, a statistically significant difference (z = −2.888, p = 0.004) indicating lower injection pain with cryotherapy. Conclusion: Pre-injection cryotherapy using a standardized ice stick produced significantly less injection pain than 2% lignocaine topical gel. It offers a simple, inexpensive and non-pharmacological chairside adjunct that can be readily incorporated into routine endodontic practice.

Cover image for Formulation and Evaluation of Proniosomal Transdermal Gel of Drug Luliconazole

Formulation and Evaluation of Proniosomal Transdermal Gel of Drug Luliconazole

TAPASYA DWIVEDI

INTRODUCTION: Proniosomal gels are generally present in transparent, translucent or white semisolid gel texture, which makes them physically stable during storage and transport. Due to the limited solvent system present, the proniosomes formed were the mixture of many phases of liquid crystal, viz. lamellar, hexagonal and cubic phase liquid crystals as given in dissolution of most surfactants in water, leads to the formation of lipotropic liquid crystals rather than micelle solution. Lamellar phase shows sheets of surfactants arranged in bilayer form, whereas in hexagonal phase cylindrical units are packed in hexagonal fashion. Cubic phase consists of curved bio-continuous lipid bilayer extending in three dimensions, separating two congruent networks of water channels. These liquid crystals present an attractive appearance because of their, transparency and high viscosity, although in the beginning of its formation, a short range of less viscous compositions (so called liquid/gel compositions) appear in some cases. Addition of water leads to interaction between water and polar groups of the surfactant results in swelling of bilayers. When the concentration of solvent is increased above a limited value, the bilayer tends to form random spherical structures, i.e., multilamellar, multivesicular structures. When shaken with water i.e., the aqueous phase of water, complete hydration takes place leading to the formation of niosomes. The beauty of these proniosomes lies in their ability to rearrange as stable niosomal suspensions, on hydration with water.

Cover image for Physiological, Psychological, and Clinical Effects of Oral Contraceptive Pills: A Systematic Narrative Synthesis

Physiological, Psychological, and Clinical Effects of Oral Contraceptive Pills: A Systematic Narrative Synthesis

Dr Dhanavanti Runwal, Dr S M Biradar, Misba Nalband, Juveriya Jamkhandi

Combined and progestogen-only oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) are among the most widely used reversible methods of fertility control worldwide, yet their physiological and psychological effects remain debated across multiple clinical domains. This manuscript synthesizes findings from seventeen recent publications—systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized trials, cohort studies, and cross-sectional surveys—covering the cognitive, cardiovascular, metabolic, musculoskeletal, psychological, and reproductive effects of OCPs, together with their history, therapeutic applications, and emerging formulations. Effects prove domain- and formulation-specific: OCP use is associated with modest gains in verbal memory, while venous thromboembolism risk and inflammatory markers vary by progestin generation and androgenic activity. Findings on mortality, mood, and exercise-related muscle damage are similarly mixed, and methodological heterogeneity across the literature limits firm conclusions in several domains. Non-contraceptive use—particularly for menstrual disorders and polycystic ovary syndrome—is common and clinically valuable, although weight-related concerns remain a leading driver of discontinuation. This synthesis supports individualized, progestin-informed prescribing and identifies persistent gaps in long-term, high-quality comparative evidence.

Publication Process

Learn about our 4-step publication process

Submission Guidelines

Review requirements before submitting

Submit Article

Ready to submit your research?

921
Published Articles
1,523
Active Researchers
195
Countries
4.2
Impact Factor
Whatsapp